Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet extrait tiré de Unsettled (minor compositions, 2025), Erin Manning examine la manière dont les bases de données généalogiques au Québec ont ouvert la possibilité pour un nouveau genre d’occupation blanche : la pratique des « Prétendien·nes », des colons qui revendiquent une identité « métisse » basée sur des ancêtres autochtones remontant à la dixième génération (à des fins d’évasion fiscale et de droits de chasse) tout en conservant leurs privilèges coloniaux. Suivant les études autochtones de la généalogie de Kim TallBear et Darryl Leroux, Manning soutient ainsi que les revendications identitaires basées sur le quantum sanguin constituent une recolonisation plutôt qu’une décolonisation. À partir de ce débat qui agite les politiques canadiennes contemporaines, Manning analyse la blanchité comme une pratique systémique d’« établissement » qui stabilise la propriété coloniale. Elle critique comment les pratiques d’Équité, Diversité et Inclusion renforcent l’individualisme, et propose un « désétablissement » par ce qu’elle nomme la fabulation – des pratiques relationnelles qui refusent les logiques de propriété.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".