MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7128749895

Imperial lives: confronting the legacies of empire, disability and the Victorians

2020· article· en· W7128749895 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
E. Cleall

Bibliographic record

VenueWhite Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDisability Rights and Representation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeorge (robot)ColonialismIntersection (aeronautics)Work (physics)Race (biology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter explores the life histories of three deaf men and women from nineteenth-century Britain : John Kitto (1804-1854), George Tait (1828-1904) and Jane Groom (1839-1918), who all can, in some ways, be said to have lived imperial lives. John Kitto, from Plymouth, started work as a missionary in Malta, and later travelled to Baghdad where he wrote several texts in the ‘Orientalist’ vein. George Tait, born in the Scottish Highlands, became a Canadian settler, and set up the first school for the deaf in Halifax, Nova Scotia. And Jane Groom, originally from Shropshire, tried to establish a ‘deaf colony’ in Canada using the 1872 Homestead Act, which directly dispossessed First Nations people to secure land. As the lives of these three individuals intersected with the workings of the British Empire, this gives us an opportunity to consider the intersection between disability and colonialism more broadly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.020
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWhite Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)Same topicDisability Rights and RepresentationFrench-language works237,207