MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Las vacunas como objeto de estudios históricos.

2025· article· W7128766783 on OpenAlexfundno aff
María Isabel Porras Gallo, Adrián Carbonetti, Anny Jackeline Torres Silveira

Bibliographic record

VenueTemas Americanistas · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicMedicine and Dermatology Studies History
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Rochester
KeywordsPublic healthMEDLINEPopulationHealth services

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Las vacunas son instrumentos de una gran complejidad histórica ya que están atravesadas por aspectos políticos, económicos, sociales y culturales. Este artículo pone de relieve el entramado que caracteriza a estos objetos a partir de tres ejemplos: la elaboración de la vacuna contra la gripe española, el derrotero de la BCG entre principios y mediados del siglo XX y los cambios científico-técnicos en las vacunas contra la poliomielitis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.776
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTemas AmericanistasSame topicMedicine and Dermatology Studies HistoryFrench-language works237,207