MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7128790004 · doi:10.15468/9qrhqj

ACER: Marine Resource Inventory of the Seaside Adjunct, Kejimkujik National Park

2017· dataset· en· W7128790004 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mike Brylinsky, P. Crawford-Kellock, G.R. Daborn, Anna M. Redden

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2017
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNational parkResource (disambiguation)EstuaryDistribution (mathematics)Marine conservationEcosystemCoastal zone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Species distribution information associated with a published report describing a marine resource inventory project with the focus on the Seaside Adjunct of the Kejimkujik National Park located in Nova Scotia, Canada (Brylinksy et al, 1987) were digitized, standardized and republished by the Acadia Centre for Estuarine Research (ACER) at Acadia University as part of the COINAtlantic and OBIS Canada project “Atlantic Canada’s Biological Data for Ecosystem Planning and Decision-making”. This resource contains species presence information associated with sampling between June 8-14, 1987.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.011
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.038

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→