MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7128812751 · doi:10.1093/hisres/htaf017

Guda, a sinful woman: a multi-scalar portrait of a medieval scribe and illuminator

2025· article· en· W7128812751 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHistorical Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Heritage Materials Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWitnessContext (archaeology)PortraitMultidisciplinary approachZoomMedieval art

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This is a multidisciplinary re-evaluation of the Guda Homiliary, a medieval manuscript copied and illuminated by a scribe who identified herself as ‘a sinful woman’. We combine historical and palaeographical detective work with non-destructive Raman micro-spectroscopy to offer a multidisciplinary reassessment of this important witness to the presence of highly skilled female scribes in medieval Europe. We take a multi-scalar approach, beginning with a fresh analysis of the self-portrait initial itself, and then zooming out, first to its context within the broader manuscript, and then into the book’s place within the spiritual and economic landscapes of medieval Germany and beyond.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.665
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.151
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it