MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7128923622 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18643355

Neumatica en Recubrimiento en Polvo

2024· article· es· W7128923622 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Selection and Properties
Canadian institutionsInnovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQualitative analysisCalibrationLafora disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La neumática desempeña un papel fundamental en los procesos de recubrimiento en polvo, ya que influye directamente en la eficiencia, precisión y confiabilidad del proceso. El aire comprimido se utiliza como medio de transporte del polvo, para la fluidización del material, el control de parámetros del proceso y la limpieza del sistema. Este artículo presenta una revisión técnica de los principios neumáticos aplicados al recubrimiento en polvo, los rangos operativos típicos, los componentes críticos del sistema y las mejores prácticas de operación y mantenimiento.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.667
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0070.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1380.089

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it