MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7128946594 · doi:10.56113/takuana.v3i2.100

Peran Strategis Ahmadiyah dalam Pendidikan dan Dakwah di Dunia Barat Modern

2024· article· W7128946594 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andy Andy, Rakhmat Rakhmat

Bibliographic record

VenueTakuana Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Humaniora · 2024
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Islamic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIslamPeaceful coexistenceHigher educationGovernment (linguistics)Islamic culture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research examines the strategic role of Ahmadiyah in education and da'wah in the modern Western world. The main issue addressed is how Ahmadiyah, often facing social and theological challenges, plays a significant role in promoting moderate and peaceful Islam in the West. The study aims to fill the gap in academic literature, which has rarely discussed Ahmadiyah's role in education and dawah. Using a library research approach, data were collected from relevant books, journals, and scientific articles. The research findings show that Ahmadiyah has established several educational institutions in Western countries, such as the UK and Canada, and uses modern media like MTA International to spread its message. Ahmadiyah also promotes interfaith dialogue and peaceful coexistence in pluralistic societies. The Tahrik Jadid movement, initiated by the second Khalifah, Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmud Ahmad, supports the construction of mosques and global education programs. In conclusion, Ahmadiyah has played an important role in strengthening the image of Islam as a peaceful religion in the West despite various challenges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTakuana Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan HumanioraSame topicEducation and Islamic StudiesFrench-language works237,207