MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7128992094 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17658174

XRM2024 - Mon10K - "Dark field x-ray imaging at the femtosecond using a laser driven x-ray source"

2024· article· en· W7128992094 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Silvia Cipiccia

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBetatronLaserBeam (structure)FemtosecondSynchrotron radiationSynchrotronBeamlineParticle acceleratorScattering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Laser-driven plasma accelerators[1,2,3] are a new concept of electron accelerators, up to 1000 times more compact than conventional ones based on radiofrequency cavities. One of the remarkable features of this type of device is that the electrons wiggle inside the plasma during the acceleration emitting bright femtosecond X-ray flashes[4,5]. This X-ray emission, called betatron radiation, has been successfully used for X-ray imaging, including single shot phase contrast imaging[6]. Here we report on the combination of betatron radiation with a multimodal imaging modality, beam tracking [7], to produce transmission, refraction, and dark-field (scattering) images in a single shot at the femtosecond. Beam-tracking is a robust imaging method applicable to both synchrotron and laboratory x-ray sources. It consists of structuring the X-ray beam into physically separated beamlets using an absorption mask. The three channels, transmission, refraction, and scattering are retrieved from the distortion of the beamlets due to the presence of the sample. The experiment was carried out at the X-ray betatron beamline at the Advanced Laser Light Source in Montreal, Canada. We present the results obtained, we discuss current limitations, prospective applications, and future developments. References [1] Mangles, S. et al., (2004). Nature, 431 (535-538) [2] Geddes, C.G.R. et al., (2004). Nature, 431 (538-541) [3] Faure J. et al., (2004). Nature, 431 (541-544) [4] Kneip S. et al. (2010), Nat. Phys. 6 (980-983) [5] Cipiccia, S. et al., (2011), Nat. Phys. 7 (867-871) [6] Fourmaux, S. et al. (2011). Opt. Lett. 36 (2426) [7] Vittoria, F. A. et al. (2015). Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, (224102) [8] Navarrete Leon C. et al. (2023). Optica 10 (880-887)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.485
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicLaser-Plasma Interactions and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207