MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7129012230 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18655956

Parcours dans l'enseignement supérieur : devenir après le baccalauréat des élèves entrés en 6ème en 1995

2012· article· W7129012230 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Simon Lemaire

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2012
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Practices and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVocational educationQuarter (Canadian coin)Higher educationSecondary educationCertificateGeneral education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

English:One recent change in the study path followed by young people in higher education is that they now leave their studies at a higher level: one third of pupils from the generation that entered the first year of secondary education in 1995 left the education system with at least a diploma at level baccalauréat + 3 years, compared with only a quarter from the previous generation, who entered the first year in 1989. In all, 44% obtained a diploma or certificate in recognition of at least two years of study after the baccalauréat. There are some significant differences according to social background: two out of three children of teachers reached the level of baccalauréat + 3 or more years' study, whereas this was the case for only one out of ten children of manual workers. The path taken in secondary education is a determining factor for continuing studies into higher education and the success achieved: the rate of successful completion of a higher education diploma ranges from 89% for those taking a general baccalauréat to 64% for the technological baccalauréat and 19% for the vocational baccalauréat. One in five young people going into higher education left with no diploma; most of these were enrolled in an Advanced technician's section (¦Section de techniciens supérieurs - ¦STS).Français:L'évolution récente dans les parcours suivis par les jeunes dans l'enseignement supérieur se caractérise principalement par une élévation de leur niveau de sortie : un tiers des élèves de la génération entrée en sixième en 1995 quitte le système éducatif avec au moins un diplôme de niveau bac + 3, contre un quart de la génération précédente, entrée en sixième en 1989. Au total, 44 % d'entre eux ont obtenu un diplôme ou une certification sanctionnant au moins deux années d'études après le baccalauréat . Les écarts sont très importants selon l'origine sociale : deux enfants d'enseignants sur trois ont accédé à un diplôme de niveau bac + 3 ou plus, tandis que ce n'est le cas que d'un enfant d'ouvrier non qualifié sur dix. Le parcours suivi dans l'enseignement secondaire est déterminant pour la poursuite d'études supérieures et leur réussite : le taux d'accès à un diplôme de l'enseignement supérieur varie de 89 % pour les bacheliers généraux à 64 % pour les bachelierstechnologiques et 19 % pour les bacheliers professionnels. Un jeune entré dans l'enseignement supérieur sur cinq est sorti sans diplôme ; les plus nombreux s'étaient inscrits dans une section de techniciens supérieurs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.606
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicEducational Practices and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207