MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7129023800 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18658797

Parcours et réussite aux diplômes universitaires : les indicateurs de la session 2013

2015· article· W7129023800 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Isabelle Maetz

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2015
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSession (web analytics)Quarter (Canadian coin)Time lagResearch methodology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

English:This summary note presents the main indicators for the trajectories and pass rates for University students: rates of transition from L1 to L2 (first to second years of a Bachelor's degree) and from M1 to M2 (first to second years of a Master's degree), rates of obtaining a Bachelor's degree, Master's degree and University technology diploma (DUT). It is accompanied by the publication of these indicators broken down per university (see box). This information is published for the third consecutive year. The results for the 2014 session should be available in the second quarter of 2016.Français:Cette note de synthèse présente les principaux indicateurs sur le parcours et la réussite des étudiants à l'Université : taux de passage de L1 en L2 et de M1 en M2, taux d'obtention de la Licence, du Master et du DUT. Elle est accompagnée de la publication de ces indicateurs déclinés par université (voir encadré). Ces informations sont publiées pour la troisième année consécutive. Les résultats de la session 2014 devraient être disponibles au deuxième trimestre 2016.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.144

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.198
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicEducation, sociology, and vocational training→French-language works237,207→