Die Mitglieder der Maśica Serbska, ihre soziale Herkunft und ihr Verhältnis zur Gesellschaft in der Oberlausitz
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Members of the Maśica Serbska, their Social Origins and their Relations with Society in Upper Lusatia The Maśica Serbska, which was founded in 1880, achieved its largest number of 266 members towards the end of its first decade of existence. Afterwards, the numbers declined continuously up to its prohibition in 1937. Since its refoundation in 1993 it has registered a little more than 20 members. The proportion of Lower Sorbian scholars rose significantly from a quarter to roughly 40 percent over the first three decades. The number of farmers, however, went down steeply, starting from way over a half, then going down to around 20 percent. The proportion of women rose only in the first decades, but, on the other hand, it was only in the Weimar Republic that a woman was entrusted with a leadership role. Up to the turn of the century more than three-quarters of all members came from the Cottbus district, particularly from the parishes of Briesen, Cottbus, Papitz, Werben, and Vetschau. The church superintendent district of Cottbus had the most members with its fifteen parishes. Then came the church districts of Senftenberg and Calau, each containing two parishes, as well as the church district of Spremberg with one parish.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".