MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Da Vinci: A Forensic Tool Recommendation System

2025· article· W7129029331 on OpenAlexaff
Harshith Sunkara, Gnaneswar Naidu Reddy, Grace Sarah Sunitha Yenubari, Umme Zakia

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital and Cyber Forensics
Canadian institutionsNew York Institute of Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital forensicsAndroid (operating system)Expert systemVisualizationRealmRecommender systemEmerging technologies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the dynamic realm of digital forensics, the Da Vinci Tool is a pivotal android application, streamlining investigative processes with its intelligent interface. From personal incidents to professional inquiries, it simplifies usage and selections of forensic tool adapting customized needs. Da Vinci leads users through preliminary investigation, in-depth analysis, final proceedings, and submissions - integrating visual evidence for comprehensive security ratings. Additional features like real-time news updates and accessible case histories enhance usability, while integration with forensic APIs ensures access to robust resources. The Da Vinci Tool improves forensic investigation effectiveness with informative, interactive ease platform ready to tackle emerging digital challenges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigital and Cyber ForensicsFrench-language works237,207