MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Mathematics Question Diagram Generation Strategy Defined with Codes and Empowered by Reasoning Large Language Models

2025· article· W7129036557 on OpenAlex
Hiu Tung Wong, Pak Lun Chan, Jiaxin Cao

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicMathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiagramFunction (biology)Code (set theory)Quality (philosophy)Code generationEncoding (memory)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current multimodal large language models (LLMs) can perform more varied and precious generation for various tasks. It has the potential to support AI-generated assignment contents. However, diagrams directly generated by multimodal LLMs (from text to image) still lack semantic accuracy and quality. Based on the Q-Buddy app, a more stable and controllable method defined with codes (DWC) has been developed to generate structured diagrams for mathematical questions by providing the function alongside the prompt to guide the generation process. Based on initial comparison results, it can be observed that there is a significant improvement in the quality of generated diagrams for mathematics quiz items. The strategy may provide some inspiration on integrating existing code features and libraries into human-LLM collaboration in educational settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it