Alamūt, ismailismo y la obra de Khwājah Qāsim Tuštarī Reconociendo a Dios
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Basándose en gran medida en el testimonio de los historiadores persas de los siglos VII y VIII de la Hégira (correspondientes a los siglos XIII-XIV de la era Cristiana), este artículo esboza una imagen detallada de varias personalidades implicadas en la fundación del naciente estado ismailí con centro en Alamūt en el siglo V/XI. Estos antecedentes sientan las bases para analizar una nueva fuente manuscrita que documenta la historia y el pensamiento ismailíes de este periodo, la obra de Khwājah Qāsim Tuštarī Reconociendo a Dios (Maʿrifat-i Khudāy taʿālā). Tras mostrar y enmendar los estudios previos sobre este autor y examinar las fuentes manuscritas y litográficas existentes del texto, el artículo analiza las referencias históricas, centrándose en la figura de Šaraf al-Dīn Muḥammad, y examinando la evolución de la estructura de liderazgo de los ismailíes. Defiende una fecha probable de composición entre los años 525/1131 y 533/1139, lo que convierte a la obra Reconociendo a Dios de Tuštari en uno de los textos ismailíes de Alamūt más antiguos que se conservan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".