MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7129055684 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18654954

The Law of Large Numbers in Complex Systems: From Statistical Convergence to Compressed Models

2021· article· W7129055684 on OpenAlex
Boris Kriger

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpace Science and Extraterrestrial Life
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaw of large numbersPrior probabilityStatistical inferenceStatistical modelBayesian probabilityCompressibilityBayesian inferenceComplex systemMeasure (data warehouse)Scale (ratio)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper, originally written in 2021 and substantially reworked in 2026, demonstrates that complex adaptive systems — biological, cognitive, and social — systematically violate the conditions required by the law of large numbers (independence, identical distribution, finite expectation), and that these violations are structurally entailed by the requirements of persistence rather than incidental. We introduce agent replaceability R(a) as a formal measure of the degree to which a system component's structural contribution can be recovered after loss, and show that decreasing replaceability forces a transition from population-level statistical averaging (the "LLN-strategy") to individual-level Bayesian inference with strong priors (the "model-strategy"). A scale-dependent compressibility criterion based on Kolmogorov complexity provides a non-circular characterization of this transition: the model-strategy becomes necessary when the environment contains compressible structure at the agent's operational scale that statistical averaging would destroy. The central theoretical contribution is the encapsulation principle: the two strategies are not alternatives but hierarchical levels of a single architecture. Every internal model is a compressed encoding of statistical regularities accumulated through an LLN-process at a longer timescale — many cheap trials → compression into model parameters → one costly action. The law of large numbers is never abandoned; it descends to a lower floor of the system's organization. This nesting is demonstrated to be recursive. Cognitive biases are shown to be Bayesian-optimal under strong priors and asymmetric loss functions, not deviations from rationality. Concrete case studies include bacterial chemotaxis (transitional case), feline ballistic motor control (full model-strategy with cerebellar forward/inverse models), microgravity experiments revealing the hierarchical failure modes of internal models under distributional shift, and neural-network robotics providing substrate-independent experimental confirmation — robots trained solely for viability spontaneously invented gait transitions. Six testable predictions are derived, including a maladaptation prediction from the encapsulation principle. The framework unifies probability theory, non-equilibrium thermodynamics, Kolmogorov complexity, predictive processing, and evolutionary biology within a single formal architecture. Part of the Unified Structural Theory of Complex Systems research program. Keywords: law of large numbers, Bayesian inference, Kolmogorov complexity, encapsulation principle, replaceability, persistence, predictive processing, cognitive heuristics, motor control, microgravity, robotics, non-equilibrium thermodynamics License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Author – Boris Kriger¹²¹ Information Physics Institute, Gosport, Hampshire, United Kingdom boris.kriger@informationphysicsinstitute.net² Institute of Integrative and Interdisciplinary Research, Toronto, Canadaboriskriger@interdisciplinary-institute.org

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.862
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it