Adultes émergents vierges en contexte clinique : une recherche qualitative auprès de professionnels
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An increasing number of individuals in Western societies are reaching adulthood without having transitioned to an active sex life. In a context where sexuality is socially valued, this situation often leads to psychological distress. This study aimed to document, from the perspective of health and social care professionals in Quebec, the characteristics and difficulties of heterosexual emerging adult virgins and the interventions provided. Seven sexologists and one social worker participated in semi-structured individual interviews. They had supported a total of 13 adult virgins aged between 19 and 29. A thematic analysis of the interviews yielded a portrait of these adults, particularly of their emotional and relational difficulties. It also highlighted essential clinical attitudes and skills for working with this population. This study emphasizes the importance for health and social care professionals to recognize the diversity of sexual trajectories and to develop inclusive, non-pathologizing, and sensitive clinical practices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it