MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7129197341 · doi:10.21697/spch.2025.61.s.03

Report on the Conference "Philosophy and Christianity. Past – Present – Future," Institute of Philosophy, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Warsaw, 12-13 June 2025

2025· article· pl· W7129197341 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jakub Płoski, Bartłomiej Uzar

Bibliographic record

VenueStudia Philosophiae Christianae · 2025
Typearticle
Languagepl
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCatholicism, Bioethics, Media, Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCzechChristianityEvent (particle physics)Higher education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On June 12-13, 2025, the international conference Philosophy and Christianity. Past – Present – Future was held at the Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw (UKSW). The event was organized to mark the 60th anniversary of the philosophical journal Studia Philosophiae Christianae, founded in 1965 at the Faculty of Christian Philosophy of the Academy of Catholic Theology in Warsaw (ATK, now UKSW). The conference gathered participants from academic centers in Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Netherlands, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, United Kingdom, and USA, who specialize in the philosophy of religion and related areas. The program included presentations by scholars representing various academic traditions, all focusing on the relationship between philosophy and Christianity from historical, contemporary, and future-oriented perspectives. ---------------------------------------- Received: 9/07/2025. Reviewed: 25/10/2025. Accepted: 12/11/2025.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.256
Threshold uncertainty score0.857

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2560.072

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudia Philosophiae ChristianaeSame topicCatholicism, Bioethics, Media, EducationFrench-language works237,207