MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Design of Hardware Accelerator Structure on FPGA for Real-Time Image Classification through Optimised Convolution Layer

2025· article· W7129600956 on OpenAlexaff
E. Deenadayalan, Hayel Khafajeh, Bibin Chidambaranathan, N. Chaitanya, Vemuri Nitin, B Rajalakshmi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField-programmable gate arrayConvolution (computer science)Key (lock)Loop unrollingDeep learningHardware accelerationInferenceLatency (audio)Gate array

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep learning models, especially CNNs, are essential in a range of key applications within AI, but they face challenges regarding computational requirements, memory limitations, and latency when deployed on resource-constrained devices. Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) offer a beneficial alternative because of their reconfigurability, efficiency, and parallel processing abilities. This paper presents a design of a hardware Accelerator Structure on an FPGA for Real-Time Image Classification Through an optimised convolution Layer (ASFRIC) model designed to facilitate real-time AI inference in embedded systems. The use of transfer learning on VGG architectures for high classification accuracy, 8-bit quantisation to improve efficiency, and a specialised backpropagation method for better learning on hardware accelerators. An engineered convolution accelerator to overcome memory limitations, relying on loop unrolling and tiling for performance improvement. A SoC-FPGA with the Xilinx Vitis AI toolchain, the ASFRIC model shows improved performance in accuracy, execution speed, and energy efficiency when compared to conventional CPU and GPU solutions. To assess the model's effectiveness, key metrics such as confidence matrix, accuracy, precision, recall, and loss are performed for evaluation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207