MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Improved Cost-Effective Indoor Air Quality Prediction through Internet of Things Edge Network and Hybrid Model

2025· article· W7129622679 on OpenAlexaff
D. Vidyanadha Babu, Mahmoud Odeh, Jajula Hari Babu, Vunnava Dinesh Babu, M. Harshini, H V Asha

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndoor air qualityParticle swarm optimizationAir quality indexProcess (computing)Energy consumptionInternet of ThingsWireless sensor networkBuilding automationEfficient energy use

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To enhance indoor air quality monitoring and decision-making, characterized by a four-layer Internet of Things (IoT) architecture involving data acquisition, processing, storage, and application we developed ICAIEH model. A Raspberry Pi with an Enviro+ board and sensors to track air quality metrics like particulate matter and carbon dioxide in real-time, securing data transmission through HTTPS and storing it in a MySQL database with local backups. The system includes revised diagnostic formulas that incorporate the concentration and duration of air pollutants, provides relative comparisons of Indoor Air Quality (IAQ), and applies mathematical functions for pollutant spike detection. It utilizes Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) to improve the accuracy and efficiency of assessments, with reportable parameters indicating a productive heatmap process, multiple fitness analysis iterations, and an adequate execution time. The following parameters are used to calculate the ICAIEH model are heatmap process of 0.97, fitness of 200 iterations of .031, fitness of 48 iterations process of 0.30, energy consumption of 0.28, and execution time of 41.8.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.838
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAir Quality Monitoring and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207