MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7130435545 · doi:10.69894/20210216

Regulatory round-up

2021· article· en· W7130435545 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Neil McNaughton

Bibliographic record

VenueOil IT Journal. · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDiverse Research and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransparency (behavior)Christian ministryXMLFossil fuelAdministration (probate law)The Internet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canadian Centre for Energy Information. Ropes & Gray’s ‘deep dive’ into new SEC oil transparency rules. New XML data checking for North Dakota reporting. Texas RRC streamlines online reporting. Biden administration puts new PHMSA rule in doubt. OSDU data store for NPD Diskos 2.0. Norway’s oil and gas metrology explained, new seismic survey reporting. UK OGA gets tough on reporting compliance, ESG taskforce established. dGB/PanTerra to Netherlands Economic Ministry ‘TNO’s NLOG is seriously outdated’. EITI mandates contract publication though disclosure remains patchy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.359
Threshold uncertainty score0.914

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0110.004
Open science0.0060.004
Research integrity0.0210.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3590.238

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOil IT Journal.Same topicDiverse Research and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207