MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7130509123 · doi:10.21070/acopen.10.2025.9829

Moderate Quarter Life Crisis Dominates Emerging Adult Students

2025· article· W7130509123 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademia Open · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldPsychology
TopicStudent Stress and Coping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Categorical variableStratified samplingDescriptive statisticsLife course approachDistressLife satisfactionDescriptive research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

General Background: Quarter Life Crisis represents an emotional crisis commonly experienced during emerging adulthood, characterized by anxiety, self-doubt, and uncertainty regarding identity, career, and interpersonal relationships. This phenomenon is particularly salient among university students transitioning from adolescence to early adulthood. Specific Background: Prior studies have documented the prevalence of Quarter Life Crisis among early adults; however, descriptive evidence detailing categorical levels and gender-based distribution remains limited. Knowledge Gap: Existing research has not comprehensively described the frequency distribution of Quarter Life Crisis categories across demographic characteristics, particularly sex, nor provided detailed statistical profiling within a large student sample. Aims: This study aimed to describe the level of Quarter Life Crisis among undergraduate students aged 18–25 years at Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo. Results: Using a quantitative descriptive design with stratified random sampling (n = 368) and a 21-item Quarter Life Crisis Scale (α = 0.92), findings revealed that 75.543% of students were categorized at a moderate level, 13.315% at a high level, and 11.141% at a low level. Both male and female students were predominantly classified in the moderate category, although total scores were slightly higher among females. Novelty: This study provides a detailed categorical and demographic breakdown of Quarter Life Crisis levels within a balanced gender sample using JASP-based descriptive statistics. Implications: The predominance of moderate levels indicates the need for preventive psychological support and self-regulation strategies to mitigate emotional distress during emerging adulthood in higher education contexts. Highlights: The Majority of Respondents Were Classified Within the Middle-Level Category (75.543%). Female Participants Obtained Slightly Higher Cumulative Scores Than Males. A Smaller Proportion Exhibited Elevated Conditions (13.315%) Compared With Lower-Level Classification (11.141%). Keywords: Quarter Life Crisis, Emerging Adulthood, University Students, Descriptive Statistics, Gender Differences

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.594
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.400 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it