MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7130512146 · doi:10.31579/2692-9562/069

Commentary on “a Retrospective Study of Incidental Findings Occurring in a Consecutive Case Series of Lateral Cephalograms of 12 to 20-Year-Old Patients Referred for Routine Orthodontic Treatment ” [1]

2023· article· W7130512146 on OpenAlexaff
David MacDonald

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology · 2023
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPharynxRetrospective cohort studySkullEndoscopyCephalogramCervical vertebrae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the lateral cephalogram (Figure 1) covers the nasal cavity, cervical vertebra and the entire pharynx (from the base of the skull right down to the larynx), findings in these areas are relevant to the oto-rhino-laryngologist. Although nasal endoscopy is the best choice for evaluation of nasopharyngeal tonsil (adenoid) size.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0230.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology→Same topicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research→French-language works237,207→