MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Hybrid Post-Quantum Secure Framework Integrating McEliece KEM, RC6 Encryption and Steganography for IoT Data Protection

2025· article· W7130545895 on OpenAlexaff
Suma Sira Jacob, Manoj Shanmugam, Keerthana Pandiyan, Mugesh Selvakumar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicChaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEncryptionCryptographySteganographyCryptosystemContext (archaeology)Data security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dramatic growth in the number of digital data which are exchanged combined with the increased complexity of cyber threats requires a system which is strong enough to provide the data confidentiality and integrity. The classical steganographic and cryptography are only adequate in the context of solitude, and not in the context of imperceptibility and resistance to sophisticated attacks. An adaptive cryptography system augmented with clever steganography is suggested to address these weaknesses. The system has been designed with three layers: (i) dynamic cryptographic layer, which uses McEliece Key Encapsulation with noise thresholds to provide post-quantum resilience, (ii) adaptive encryption layer using RC6 with a threshold parameter to use for statistical diffusion, and (iii) steganographic embedding layer using hybrid wavelet-domain embedding optimized using Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) in order to achieve imperceptibility and robustness. The layered design guarantees protection against noise, compression, and cropping attacks and at the same time computational efficiency such that it can be used in IoT and health care tasks in real time. The effectiveness of the suggested system over the traditional LSB and DWT-GA approaches is proven by experimental evidence. It is worth noting that the whole hiding capacity of the framework reaches the highest signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) of 39.8 dB, thus, meaning that, the content is greatly imperceptible at the integrity maintained. The model suggested therefore presents a secure, efficient, and scalable solution that is flexible enough to accommodate new digital ecosystems in which privacy of information and resiliency would be of utmost importance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicChaos-based Image/Signal EncryptionFrench-language works237,207