MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7130647234 · doi:10.5817/cejcs2008-6-6

Identités réelles et identités rêvées dans le Pays sans chapeau de Dany Laferrière

2008· article· en· W7130647234 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anikó Ádám

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Central European journal of Canadian studies · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCaribbean and African Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDreamIdentity (music)Natural (archaeology)Port (circuit theory)Cultural identityState (computer science)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is a number of identities which present themselves to the individuals along their lives. The notion of identity takes diverse forms, becomes dynamic, changeable, and evolves through conflicts and breaks, both in time and in space. Dany Laferrière, a writer from Quebec, is one of the most important representatives of these takings of psychological, professional and national identities. Born in Port au Prince, 17 April 1953, he grew up in the village of Petit Goâve. As a journalist, his life is menaced by the dictatorship. He thus flees to Canada in 1976. He finds asylum in Montreal and he becomes popular quickly as a Quebecois writer, as a result he turns to literature completely. The natural identity of Dany Laferrière is completed with his professional identity in Quebec, in a country whose cultural survival is confronted with multiculturalism. The present paper wishes to analyses the different identities in his novel, Pays sans chapeau (Editions Lanctôt, 1996), in which the author tries to regain and recapture his native country and his identity stolen by the dictatorship. In this novel where pages of "a real country" alternate with those of "a dream country", the author-narrator travels between his real identity and his dream identity regaining eventually his land.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.500
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Central European journal of Canadian studiesSame topicCaribbean and African Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207