MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7130665144 · doi:10.5817/cejcs2022-17-9

Emigration as augmented war experience : an (auto)biographical account of Ted Kramolc

2022· article· en· W7130665144 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Urška Strle

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Central European journal of Canadian studies · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorld Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmigrationVariety (cybernetics)Order (exchange)Point (geometry)Interpersonal communicationFeature (linguistics)Interpersonal relationship

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The biographical reconstruction of Canadian-Slovenian visual artist, writer, interior designer and art mentor Ted Kramolc (1922–2013) as presented in the following article focuses in particular on his life before he reached Canada. This reconstruction is based on the notion that his decision to emigrate should be viewed as an extended experience of the Second World War. The author has based this article on her own belief that in order to understand the social consequences of war, it is necessary to fortify historiographic sensibilities regarding personal experiences, interpersonal relationships and the variety of meanings ascribed to war. At the same time, the author seeks to broaden the point of observation to both the time preceding the war and the time following it. Empirically, the article is supported both by the available archive material as well as an analysis of as-yet-unpublished autobiographical sources. Insights from Kramolc's literary oeuvre, which to a large extent derive from lucid reflections on his own life experiences, also feature in the article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.354
Threshold uncertainty score0.711

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0200.020
Scholarly communication0.0100.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Central European journal of Canadian studiesSame topicWorld Wars: History, Literature, and ImpactFrench-language works237,207