Византийские переводные и славяно-русские оригинальные акафисты на начальном этапе их бытования на Руси (нач. XV — перв. четв. XVI в.): источниковедческий аспект
Bibliographic record
Abstract
С момента выхода монографии А. В. Попова «Православные русские акафисты» (1903 г.) по настоящее время исследователями не рассматривался специально вопрос возникновения на Руси традиции использования акафистов. Существенным препятствием для этого оказывается скудное число известных источников, которые можно отнести к начальному этапу акафистной традиции: начало XV - первая четверть XVI в. Собственный археографический поиск авторов существенно расширяет источниковую базу: в статье рассмотрено шестнадцать рукописей, хронологически принадлежащих раннему этапу, из которых восемь привлекаются впервые. Это позволило достоверно установить одиннадцать гимнов, составляющих основу акафистной традиции в русской книжности. Авторство некоторых гимнов принадлежит, как свидетельствуют заглавия списков, греческим и славянским авторам: патр. Исидору Вухиру, свт. Филофею Коккину, иером. Мартирию Печерскому и митрополиту всея Руси Феодосию (Бывальцеву). Определены основные проблемы, требующие решения при дальнейшем изучении традиции. Во-первых, проблема выделения стадий в процессе формирования состава гимнов, возникающая в связи с различной частотностью их появления в списках. Во-вторых, проблема псевдоэпиграфов в отношении текстов, надписанных именем патр. Исидора, поскольку лишь один гимн традиции достоверно ему атрибутирован (известен греческий прототип), тогда как в нескольких случаях его имя находим в гимнах, заведомо ему не принадлежащих. Since the publication of the monograph by A. V. Popov «Orthodox Russian Akathists» (1903) up to the present time, researchers have not specifically considered the issue of the origin of the tradition of using akathists in Rus’. A significant obstacle to this is the meager number of known sources that can be attributed to the initial stage of the akathist tradition: the beginning of the 15th - first quarter of the 16th century. The authors’ own archaeographic search significantly expands the source base: sixteen manuscripts chronologically belonging to the early stage are examined, eight of which are used for the first time. This made it possible to identify eleven hymns that form the basis of the akathist tradition in ancient Russian literature. The authorship of some hymns, as evidenced by the titles of the lists, belongs to Greek and Slavic authors: Patriarch Isidore Vukhir, St. Philotheus Coccinus, Hieromonk Martyrius of the Caves, and Metropolitan of All Rus’ Theodosius (Byvaltsev). The main problems requiring solution in further study of the tradition are identified. Firstly, the problem of identifying stages in the process of formation of the composition of hymns, arising in connection with the different frequency of their appearance in the manuscripts. Secondly, the problem of pseudepigraphs in relation to texts inscribed with the name of Patriarch Isidore Vukhir, since only one hymn of tradition is reliably attributed to him (the Greek prototype is known), while in several cases his name is found in hymns that are obviously not his.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".