MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7130688382 · doi:10.1109/swc65939.2025.00083

Real-Time FPGA-Based Object Detection with Bit-Width Adaptive Quantization

2025· article· W7130688382 on OpenAlexaff
Bita Asghari, Henry Leung

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantization (signal processing)Object detectionInferenceLatency (audio)DetectorEdge deviceSoftware deploymentToolchain

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Real-time object detection on edge devices such as drones and IoT systems requires high-throughput, low-latency inference within limited hardware resources.This paper presents a hardware-aware deployment framework for the YOLOv2-Tiny object detector on FPGA, targeting low-latency and high-throughput inference in real-time edge applications. Most existing FPGA-based object detectors either skip quantization or adopt static, uniform bit-widths without considering layer-wise latency sensitivity, leading to inefficient hardware utilization and suboptimal throughput. To address this limitation, we propose a latency-guided mixed-precision quantization scheme that assigns 4-, 6-, and 8-bit representations based on each layer’s computational demand. This assignment is driven by detailed inference-time profiling of layer latency and MAC operations on the YOLOv2-Tiny network. The proposed quantization strategy is integrated into the Vitis AI toolchain and deployed on the ZCU102 board using the DPUCZDX8G accelerator. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our method: the system achieves 41 FPS at 150 MHz, outperforming prior FPGA- and GPU-based YOLOv2-Tiny implementations by up to 25% in frame rate. The Proposed maintains detection accuracy while significantly reduces model size and resource usage, offering a practical solution for embedded vision systems under strict power and latency constraints.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.802
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207