MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7130714394 · doi:10.1109/swc65939.2025.00224

Fourier Single Pixel Imaging via Spatial-Temporal 3D Joint Priors

2025· article· W7130714394 on OpenAlexaff
Duo Chen, Ziyi Dai, Zixin Tang, Zhiqin Zhu, Hao Zhu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRandom lasers and scattering media
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersChongqing Municipal Education CommissionChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNatural Science Foundation of ChongqingChongqing University
KeywordsUndersamplingPrior probabilitySmoothnessHessian matrixFourier transformJoint (building)Sampling (signal processing)Regularization (linguistics)Iterative reconstruction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Single-pixel devices excel in imaging non-visible wavebands and extreme conditions but struggle with low spatial and temporal resolution, particularly at low sampling rates. Fourier single-pixel imaging (FSI) uses sinusoidal structured illumination to capture an image’s Fourier spectrum, allowing high-quality reconstructions with fewer measurements. However, traditional FSI combined with total variation (TV) regularization often results in overly smooth images with staircase artifacts, especially with aggressive undersampling. To address these challenges, we propose a novel 3D Hessian-Based FSI reconstruction framework that extends the 2D Hessian regularizer into the spatial-temporal domain, leveraging inter-frame redundancy. Our method integrates a second-order smoothness prior with a local low-rank temporal constraint, implemented through a plug-and-play ADMM algorithm. Simulation results show significant improvements, achieving about 5 dB PSNR gain at just a 10% sampling rate, while preserving fine spatial details and avoiding staircase artifacts. This approach combines theoretical rigor with practicality, making it suitable for real-time single-pixel video imaging under extreme undersampling conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.832
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRandom lasers and scattering mediaFrench-language works237,207