MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7130718798 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18718054

Decolonizing Art Histories in Côte d'Ivoire: New Perspectives and Methodologies

2000· article· en· W7130718798 on OpenAlex
Gnassi Kouassi, Tchenguiz Deneh, Seyni Sissoko, Koffi Baoulé

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicNew Caledonia Indigenous Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitute on Governance
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExhibitionEthnographyDecolonizationContemporary artAnthropology of artFocus (optics)African artHistory of art

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Art history in Côte d'Ivoire has traditionally been Eurocentric, with a focus on European and Western art forms. This has marginalized local artistic traditions and perspectives. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, integrating ethnographic research with archival analysis of local art practices and contemporary exhibitions in Ivorian cities. A significant proportion (34%) of artworks exhibited in major Ivorian galleries are by artists who were previously unrecognized in official art histories. This highlights the need for more inclusive art narratives. Decolonizing Côte d'Ivoire's art history requires a reevaluation of existing methodologies and a greater recognition of local artistic traditions and practices. Future research should prioritise collaboration between scholars, artists, and community leaders to ensure that decolonization efforts are grounded in lived experiences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.829
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it