Bibliographic record
Abstract
Radical Insurgencies brings together a powerful body of lecture-based scholarship by Molefi Kete Asante, the most published African American scholar, with more than one hundred authored and edited titles. This volume assembles keynote lectures, conference papers, and public intellectual interventions delivered across North America, Africa, Asia, and the Caribbean, and refines them into a cohesive academic work. Spanning historical materials from the eighteenth century to the early twenty-first century, the book traces African insurgency as a sustained tradition of ethical resistance rather than episodic protest. Drawing on archival records, political history, Africological theory, and contemporary global analysis, Asante positions insurgency as an expression of African agency—rooted in culture, consciousness, and historical location. The chapters engage foundational figures such as Harriet Tubman, David Walker, Marcus Garvey, and modern Pan-African theorists while advancing a rigorous critique of ideological dependency and Eurocentric frameworks. The work challenges prevailing interpretations of radicalism by asserting Systematic Nationalism and Afrocentricity as authentic African-centered intellectual traditions. Notably, several chapters are based on speeches and international conference presentations, including those at scholarly forums in Vancouver, Harare, and Guangzhou. This lecture-based foundation gives the text its distinctive clarity, urgency, and pedagogical strength, making it particularly effective for graduate instruction and advanced theoretical study. Radical Insurgencies stands as both an archive of live scholarship and a definitive statement of Africological thought, affirming African centrality as essential to ethical inquiry, political analysis, and global intellectual development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".