MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7130832396 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18723143

Women-Owned Businesses' Access to ICT Services in Nairobi Slums: A Policy and Technological Analysis

2000· article· en· W7130832396 on OpenAlexaff
Njeri Mutua

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicICT in Developing Communities
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInformation and Communications TechnologyThe InternetDigital divideInternet accessDigital literacyQualitative researchLiteracyFace (sociological concept)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research examines the barriers faced by women-owned businesses in Nairobi slums regarding their access to information and communication technology (ICT) services. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 50 women-owned business owners in Nairobi slums to gather insights into their experiences and challenges. A mixed-methods approach was employed, including both structured questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. The analysis revealed a significant proportion (38%) of respondents faced issues related to inadequate ICT infrastructure in their areas, particularly concerning internet connectivity speed and reliability. Women-owned businesses in Nairobi slums face substantial challenges in accessing ICT services, with technological deficits being one of the primary barriers. Digital literacy training programmes have shown promise in addressing these gaps. Policymakers should prioritise investments in digital infrastructure to improve internet connectivity and accessibility for women-owned businesses. Additionally, targeted training initiatives are recommended to enhance their ICT usage skills. Model estimation used $\hat{\theta}=argmin_{\theta}\sum_i\ell(y_i,f_\theta(x_i))+\lambda\lVert\theta\rVert_2^2$, with performance evaluated using out-of-sample error.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicICT in Developing CommunitiesFrench-language works237,207