Integrating Indigenous Knowledge Systems into AI Development in West Africa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The integration of Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) into Artificial Intelligence (AI) development in West Africa is a nascent but crucial area of research with significant potential for socio-economic impact. A comprehensive search strategy was employed using academic databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The review included studies published between and that examined AI development practices in conjunction with IKS. The findings indicate a growing interest but limited empirical evidence on the integration of IKS into AI models, particularly regarding the effectiveness of such integrations in enhancing model accuracy and cultural relevance. A notable theme is the need for culturally adapted machine learning algorithms to ensure ethical compliance and acceptance among local communities. While there is nascent research indicating potential benefits from integrating IKS into AI development, more empirical studies are needed to substantiate these claims with robust methodologies that account for contextual factors such as cultural nuances and societal impact. Further research should prioritise culturally informed machine learning algorithms and incorporate stakeholder perspectives in the development process. Policy makers should also consider frameworks for promoting IKS integration into AI systems, ensuring they are aligned with ethical standards and public acceptance. Model estimation used $\hat{\theta}=argmin_{\theta}\sum_i\ell(y_i,f_\theta(x_i))+\lambda\lVert\theta\rVert_2^2$, with performance evaluated using out-of-sample error.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".