AI Factories as Enterprise Intelligence Infrastructure: How GPU-Powered Systems Are Redefining Value Creation across Industries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Artificial intelligence is rapidly transitioning from a set of discrete analytical tools into a foundational enterprise infrastructure. The concept of AI factories captures this shift by framing GPU-powered systems as integrated environments where data ingestion, model training, inference, and continuous optimization occur at industrial scale. This abstract examines AI factories as enterprise intelligence infrastructure and analyzes how high-performance computing architectures are redefining value creation across multiple industries. Unlike traditional IT systems optimized for transactional efficiency, AI factories are designed for learning velocity, enabling organizations to transform raw data into predictive, adaptive, and autonomous capabilities. Central to this transformation are graphics processing units, high-bandwidth interconnects, and optimized software stacks that jointly support parallel computation, real-time analytics, and large-scale model deployment. The study synthesizes recent industry practices and academic perspectives to demonstrate how AI factories are reshaping sectors such as manufacturing, finance, healthcare, energy, and logistics. In manufacturing, GPU-accelerated intelligence enables predictive maintenance, process optimization, and digital twins that reduce downtime and resource waste. Financial institutions leverage AI factories for fraud detection, algorithmic trading, and personalized risk assessment at unprecedented speed and accuracy. In healthcare, these infrastructures support medical imaging analysis, clinical decision support, and population-level health forecasting, improving outcomes while lowering operational costs. Across energy and supply chains, AI factories facilitate demand forecasting, grid optimization, and resilient logistics planning under uncertainty. Beyond operational gains, the paper argues that AI factories represent a strategic asset that redefines organizational value creation. By embedding continuous learning into core operations, enterprises shift from reactive decision-making toward anticipatory and adaptive intelligence. This transition alters competitive dynamics, workforce skill requirements, and governance models, raising critical questions around data stewardship, ethical AI deployment, cybersecurity, and sustainability of energy-intensive computing systems. The abstract concludes by positioning AI factories as the backbone of next-generation enterprises, emphasizing that their successful adoption depends not only on GPU capacity, but on integrated strategy, responsible governance, and alignment with long-term business and societal objectives. Collectively, these insights position AI factories as scalable intelligence platforms capable of converting computational power into sustained innovation, measurable productivity, and resilient competitive advantage across complex digital ecosystems globally and.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".