MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7131072390 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18731992

Pablo Palazuelo: The Line as a Dream of Architecture

2023· book· en· W7131072390 on OpenAlexaff
Pablo Palazuelo, Gonzalo Sotelo Calvillo, MARIA TERESA RAVENTOS VIÑAS, Ángela García de Paredes, Ignacio Pedrosa García, Mariano Bayón, Pere Casanovas Simón, Ramón Ayerza Elizarain

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typebook
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitecture and Art History Studies
Canadian institutionsAS Composite (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExhibitionSketchArchitectureTransparency (behavior)DreamFormative assessmentLine (geometry)Cataloging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This publication is the catalogue for the exhibition of the same name, which presents for the first time the career of this Spanish painter, sculptor, and engraver, the leading figure of 20th-century geometric abstraction, through a selection of works and projects that illustrate the intense relationship between architecture and his artistic production. It is structured into nine sections, ranging from the artist's formative years and early influences to his furniture designs for the home and large-scale works conceived for urban spaces, as well as pieces that emphasize references to labyrinths, passageways, enclosures, boundaries, and stained glass. In total, 12 works and 12 projects are on display, including drawings, sketches, watercolors, models, and sculptures, all from the collection of the Pablo Palazuelo Foundation. Many of these have remained unpublished until their cataloging by the curators and are being shown to the public for the first time. The exhibition is curated by Teresa Raventós-Viñas and Gonzalo Sotelo-Calvillo, the latter being the author of a doctoral thesis, "Analysis of the Geometry of Pablo Palazuelo from the Architect's Perspective," which, defended at the Polytechnic University of Madrid in 2015, serves as the basis for the exhibition. In Sotelo's words, Palazuelo's creative method "bears a striking resemblance to the methodology of architectural design, progressing through a series of graphic stages that led him gradually from initial sketches to more defined plans for materialization." This particular method led him, for example, to use sketch paper, whose transparency allowed him to superimpose different sketches while developing his works—a system he learned during his initial architectural training at the City of Oxford School of Arts and Crafts, where he studied between 1933 and 1936.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.111

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicArchitecture and Art History StudiesFrench-language works237,207