MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7131074090 · doi:10.1115/imece2025-166726

Machine Learning Based Data Driven Prediction of Process-Induced Porosity in LPBF Using CT Scan Data and Thermal Modeling

2025· article· W7131074090 on OpenAlexaff
Abdul Qadeer, Aazim Shafi Lone, S. Sohail Akhtar, Abba A. Ababakar, Abul Fazal M. Arif, A. J. Qureshi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPorosityArtificial neural networkData-drivenClassifier (UML)Convolutional neural networkMultilayer perceptronPorous mediumThermal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Laser Metal Additive Manufacturing (MAM) offers a unique opportunity to produce complex parts with internal structures, enabling tailored mechanical and functional properties. Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) is widely used to fabricate intricate geometries, including porous structures that serve diverse applications. In dense components, porosity is typically minimized to enhance mechanical performance. However, in specific applications, controlled porosity can be beneficial such as increasing permeability for filtration, enhancing osteointegration in biomedical implants, or reducing strength to mitigate stress shielding effects. Porosity in LPBF parts can be introduced either through designed lattice pore structures or process-induced porosity. The latter, controlled at the melt pool level, is particularly challenging to predict due to complex interactions of melt pool dynamics, surface tension effects, and localized instabilities, leading to striation and pore agglomeration at melt pool nodes. Accurate prediction of the resulting porous structure under different processing conditions is crucial for optimizing the functional performance of LPBF components. This study presents a data-driven modeling approach for rapid and accurate prediction of process-induced porous structures in LPBF. A deep learning framework integrating Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) is developed to predict structural features based on process parameters. The model is trained and validated using CT scan slice data extracted from multiple regions of fabricated samples, ensuring a comprehensive representation of pore structures. To streamline data extraction, a custom Python script is developed to automate CT scan processing. This enables efficient handling of large datasets while maintaining accuracy in capturing structural details. The extracted data is converted into structured 256 × 256 grayscale images. To further enhance predictive accuracy, a conduction-based thermal model using ANSYS is employed to supplement the dataset with simulated results. This physics-based model provides insights into heat distribution, offering a more comprehensive understanding of process-induced porosity. By incorporating both experimental CT data and simulation results, this hybrid approach creates a robust dataset for modeling the interactions governing porosity formation in LPBF. One key advantage is its ability to overcome the limitations of experimental data, which are often constrained by specific process conditions. Integrating simulation-derived data extends the model’s applicability across a wider process space and improves predictive performance. The results demonstrate a highly accurate and computationally efficient framework for mapping process-structure relationships in LPBF-fabricated 17-4 PH stainless steel components. This study supports the optimization of process conditions, enabling improved control over porosity and enhancing the functional performance of additively manufactured porous structures. The proposed AI-driven model significantly reduces computational costs and experimental effort, providing a scalable approach for process optimization in metal additive manufacturing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and ProcessesFrench-language works237,207