MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7131077999 · doi:10.1109/iccvw69036.2025.00091

SADWA: Fine-Grained Weather Awareness with Vision-Language Models for Seamless Autonomous Driving in Real Time

2025· article· W7131077999 on OpenAlexaff
Junsu Kim, O Hayeon, Youngmin Oh, Kyounghwan An, Donghwan Lee

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisibilitySoftware deploymentFocus (optics)ScalabilityAdverse weatherCategorizationInferenceGranularity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autonomous driving systems require adaptive driving strategies to ensure safe and efficient operation under diverse weather and road conditions. Traditional weather classification models often categorize images into broad labels such as clear, rainy, or snowy, lacking the finer granularity required for real-world driving scenarios. In this work, we fine-tune a lightweight vision-language model on a dataset that captures nuanced weather conditions, considering factors such as road surface state, precipitation intensity, visibility obstructions, and time of day. Rather than comparing models of different modalities, our focus is to demonstrate that a compact CLIP-based model can efficiently classify 18 strategically defined weather-road interaction classes-providing fast and accurate perception aligned with the demands of autonomous driving. Experimental results show that our approach enables real-time inference (17–19 ms) while maintaining strong classification performance. The proposed method supports practical deployment on resource-constrained platforms and offers a scalable path toward fine-grained weather awareness for autonomous systems, ultimately enhancing safety and decision-making under adverse environmental conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.415
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyFrench-language works237,207