MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7131099650 · doi:10.3917/rsc.2101.0239c

Grégory Gomez del Prado et Stéphane Leman-Langlois, (avec la collaboration de Benoît Gagnon), Police et Policing au Québec. Concepts, acteurs et enjeux . Éditions Yvon Blais, 2020

2021· article· fr· W7131099650 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Line Beauchesne

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de science criminelle et de droit pénal comparé · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolicing Practices and Perceptions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Law enforcementWork (physics)InterrogationField (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article dresse le bilan de dix ans de jurisprudence rendue par la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme en matière d'emprisonnement à perpétuité. L'emprisonnement perpétuel a fait l'objet de très nombreuses décisions, lesquelles se doivent d'être analysées pour comprendre les critères retenus par la Haute Cour. L'article dresse finalement les enseignements, constatant un important problème de fond parfois tempéré par une procédure justement appréhendée.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.259
Threshold uncertainty score0.520

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de science criminelle et de droit pénal comparéSame topicPolicing Practices and PerceptionsFrench-language works237,207