MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7131116195 · doi:10.3917/rsc.2101.0239e

Félix Séguin et Éric Thibault, La source . Montréal, Les Éditions du Journal, 2020, 283 pages

2021· article· fr· W7131116195 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
André Normandeau

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de science criminelle et de droit pénal comparé · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSet (abstract data type)Natural (archaeology)Context (archaeology)Relation (database)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article dresse le bilan de dix ans de jurisprudence rendue par la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme en matière d'emprisonnement à perpétuité. L'emprisonnement perpétuel a fait l'objet de très nombreuses décisions, lesquelles se doivent d'être analysées pour comprendre les critères retenus par la Haute Cour. L'article dresse finalement les enseignements, constatant un important problème de fond parfois tempéré par une procédure justement appréhendée.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.727
Threshold uncertainty score0.549

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.013
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1160.048

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueRevue de science criminelle et de droit pénal comparéSame topicLiterature and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207