PENGUKURAN DAN PENINGKATAN TINGKAT PELAYANAN JALUR PEJALAN KAKI DI JALAN BRAGA KOTA BANDUNG
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ketersediaan jalur pejalan kaki yang aman dan nyaman salah satu dasar penting dalam keberlanjutan perkotaan. Jalan Braga merupakan kawasan cagar budaya dan pariwisata dengan aktivitas utama perdagangan dan jasa. Pada hari biasa, persepsi terhadap jalur pejalan kaki di Braga tergolong baik dari segi fasilitas. Akan tetapi, di hari libur, jumlah pejalan kaki menjadi sangat padat yang menyebabkan terganggunya sirkulasi dan kenyamanan berjalan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengukur tingkat pelayanan jalur pejalan kaki Braga saat padat serta merumuskan upaya peningkatan pelayanan yang paling sesuai. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah deskriptif kuantitatif dengan teknik analisis mengacu pada Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2022. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tingkat pelayanan jalur pejalan kaki Braga saat ramai mencapai tingkat terendah yaitu tingkat F. Dengan menguji berbagai skenario, hanya pedestrianisasi yang mampu meningkatkan tingkat pelayanan menjadi D yaitu kondisi berjalan yang nyaman dengan kecepatan normal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.059 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".