PERAN MODAL SOSIAL DALAM PEMBERDAYAAN EKONOMI MASYARAKAT DI KAWASAN KUMUH MOJO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Program tata ulang fisik di kawasan kumuh secara masif telah dilakukan oleh Pemerintah, tetapi belum banyak menyertakan program kegiatan pemberdayaan ekonomi masyarakat. Padahal peningkatan ekonomi masyarakat ini penting untuk dapat menjamin keberhasilan tata ulang fisik. Sementara itu, tanpa inisiatif kegiatan tersebut, masyarakat melakukan pemberdayaan secara mandiri dengan prinsip mempertahankan pendapatan. Hal ini penting untuk diidentifikasi, dan akan menjadikan masukan bagi pemerintah dalam menentukan kebijakan penerapan program selanjutnya. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pola pemberdayaan ekonomi masyarakat khususnya terkait pendapatan masyarakat dalam kerangka kolaborasi triple helix di kawasan kumuh Mojo di kota Surakarta. Metodologi yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kualitatif dengan pengumpulan data melalui studi dokumen dan wawancara terhadap pemangku kepentingan dan masyarakat setempat. Sebagai hasilnya, dalam hal pemberdayaan ekonomi masyarakat secara mandiri, pengaruh modal sosial khususnya peran beberapa intermediator independen yang dikelola oleh masyarakat, sangat dominan mempengaruhi kebertahanan dalam tingkat pendapatan masyarakat.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".