The Price of Screen Time: How Prolonged Digital Exposure is Contributing to Rising Stress and Anxiety Among University Students
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study examines how screen time impacts university students' psychological state by evaluating their conditions related to stress, anxiety, depression and sleep patterns. Screen time has experienced an increase, mainly because of remote learning implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic, which researchers connect to deteriorating mental health conditions. Screen-related activities lead to fragile sleep quality, reduced physical exercise, and undesirable social relations, which combine to worsen stress and depression symptoms. Student behaviours that include watching complete shows in short periods tend to worsen procrastination and emotional withdrawal while causing social separation that diminishes mental wellness. The analysis indicates that psychological health is negatively impacted by excessive screen time, particularly when individuals surpass the recommended limits. The research indicates that sleep problems act as a connection between excessive screen time and mental health problems. The study demonstrates that healthy mental results need proper screen time regulation and outdoor activities. However, universities must establish programs to ensure both limitations in screen-time exposure and support for physical activity and wellness. Implementing these initiatives demonstrates the potential to enhance students' wellness conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".