MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Insar Reveals Limited Summer Subsidence Two Decades After Wildfires Under the 2023 Heat Anomaly in North Yukon

2025· article· W7131246505 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zetao Cao, Masato Furuya

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermafrostSubsidenceInterferometric synthetic aperture radarTaigaVegetation (pathology)Climate changeBorealTundra

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Permafrost stability is increasingly threatened by rising temperatures and extreme heat anomalies, particularly in wildfire-affected sub-arctic boreal regions. In this study, we applied InSAR to track permafrost ground deformation around several fire scars across Dempster Highway in North Yukon, Canada, focusing on its response to the recordbreaking 2023 heat anomaly. Our results show limited subsidence$(<10 \text{mm})$along the line-of-Sight (LOS) direction within the scars burned nearly and more than two decades ago, much smaller than that$(>20 \text{mm})$within unburned areas, while sustained frost heave up to 20 mm was detected in the previous freezing season. This can be interpreted as the permafrost aggradation due to the vegetation recovery and greening decades after the fire. These findings provide new insights into the resilience of boreal permafrost to climate extremes and highlight the importance of continuous InSAR monitoring to assess permafrost dynamics under increasing wildfire and warming trends.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.411
Threshold uncertainty score0.826

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→