MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7131269307 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18759719

Cybersecurity Challenges and Strategies in East African Financial Systems: A Beninese Perspective

2002· article· en· W7131269307 on OpenAlexaff
Ehouam Yves Abomey, Dossa Bonaventure Cotonou, Atsera Amougou Koffi

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation and Cyber Security
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAuditData breachPerspective (graphical)Key (lock)Government (linguistics)Emerging marketsFinancial stabilityCompliance (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cybersecurity threats have become a critical concern for financial systems worldwide, including those in East Africa. Benin, as part of this region, faces unique challenges due to its geographical proximity and economic interconnectivity with other countries like Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining qualitative interviews with quantitative data analysis on cybersecurity incidents reported by financial institutions over the past five years. The analysis revealed a high incidence rate of cyber-attacks (72%) targeting East African financial systems. Key themes identified include inadequate training for staff and insufficient use of encryption technologies in critical operations. This study underscores the urgent need for enhanced cybersecurity protocols, including regular security audits and more robust employee training programmes. Financial institutions are advised to implement stronger data protection measures and invest in advanced threat detection systems. Regulatory bodies should also consider mandating stricter compliance with international cybersecurity standards. Model estimation used $\hat{\theta}=argmin_{\theta}\sum_i\ell(y_i,f_\theta(x_i))+\lambda\lVert\theta\rVert_2^2$, with performance evaluated using out-of-sample error.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.786
Threshold uncertainty score0.508

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicInformation and Cyber SecurityFrench-language works237,207