MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Adaptive Intelligence-Driven Virtual Synchronous Generator Control for Enhanced Transient Stability in Multi-Terminal HVDC Systems

2025· article· W7131279397 on OpenAlexaff
Qihang Sun, Xiangyu Li, Jiaqi Yao, Yuxing Dai, Kamal Al- Haddad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureGeorgetown Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Transient (computer programming)InertiaElectric power systemStability (learning theory)TestbedParticle swarm optimizationSynchronizingPower (physics)Transient response

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proliferation of inverter-based renewable energy resources fundamentally challenges power system stability due to diminished inertia and weakened grid-forming capabilities. This paper proposes an adaptive virtual synchronous generator control framework integrating particle swarm optimization for real-time parameter adaptation and transient stability enhancement mechanisms specifically designed for multi-terminal HVDC systems with offshore wind integration. The methodology synthesizes electromechanical dynamics modeling with multi-objective cost function minimization, achieving autonomous adjustment of virtual inertia and damping coefficients responsive to grid strength variations. Experimental validation on a 15 kW hardware-in-the-loop testbed demonstrates 64% reduction in performance cost metrics, 51% decrease in maximum angular excursion during faults, and tripled stability margins compared to conventional fixed-parameter approaches, validating the framework's efficacy for robust grid-forming operation under diverse operational scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207