MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

LiV: Live DASH Streaming for Volumetric Video

2025· article· W7131286450 on OpenAlexaff
Amir Allahveran, Reza Hedayati Majdabadi, Mea Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Quality Assessment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEncoderHigh fidelityEncoding (memory)Bandwidth (computing)Data compressionDynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTPRangingFidelityCodec

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Volumetric video is transforming immersive media and remote interaction, enabling applications ranging from holographic telepresence to augmented reality concerts. Despite its potential across various industries, real-time delivery is challenged by substantial data volume and stringent requirements for low-latency, high-quality streaming. Previous research has addressed these issues through improved compression efficiency, faster encoding and decoding processes, and adaptive streaming protocols to address network variability. However, a practical solution for live volumetric video streaming remains elusive. This paper introduces LiV, a live Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP (DASH) system specifically designed for general volumetric video. LiV effectively balances bandwidth demands and computational efficiency, facilitating stall-free playback and high visual quality. Leveraging a parallelized execution of the Draco encoder and decoder, our evaluations demonstrate that LiV enables smooth, real-time streaming with enhanced visual fidelity within the user’s field-of-view (FoV). LiV also significantly reduces the bandwidth demand by up to 30%. These findings mark a significant step toward practical live volumetric video with broad implications for immersive media.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.876
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Video Quality AssessmentFrench-language works237,207