More Than Resistances: Mutual Support as a Provocation to Family Intervention in Chile's Child Protection System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Practitioners who implement family interventions in Chile's child and adolescent policy confront daily tensions. These difficulties arise from the dysfunctional operation of this institutional framework and are a consequence of the neoliberalism imposed on the Chilean state during the civil-military dictatorship (1973–1990). In response, practitioners carry out discreet, precarious, and fragmented forms of professional resistance that remain confined to the individual sphere of action of those who enact them. In this article, we propose that mutual support can be a practice that amplifies the effects of these professional resistances within family intervention. Drawing on individual interviews with practitioners working in Chile's child and adolescent policy, the study analyzes gestures that run counter to the neoliberal logics embedded in Chile's child-protection policy and in the professional subjectivities of those who implement it. From a vulnerable position, these professionals must know how to strategize to survive and safeguard their work with families.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".