MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7131347351 · doi:10.31031/eaes.2025.13.000811

"Linking Seasonal Climate Variability and Agricultural Yield Decline: Evidence from Tiko, Cameroon"

2025· article· W7131347351 on OpenAlexaff
Dr. Abel Tsolocto

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Analysis & Ecology Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicClimate change impacts on agriculture
Canadian institutionsUniversité TÉLUQ
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgricultureYield (engineering)Agricultural productivityClimate changeSeasonalityCrop yield

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates the impacts of seasonal climate variability on staple crop yields and household food security in Tiko, Cameroon, over the period 1994-2024.Analyses reveal significant warming trends, with dry season maximum temperatures rising by 0.83 °C and rainy season temperatures increasing by 0.45 °C, alongside erratic precipitation patterns marked by declining rainy season rainfall and clustered dry season droughts.These climatic shifts coincide with sharp yield declines in maize (86%), cocoyam (85%), and cassava, driven by climate stress thresholds: dry season temperatures above 32.5 °C induce maize pollen sterility, relative humidity exceeding 91% exacerbates cocoyam fungal diseases, and rainy season rainfall beyond 2,600mm causes cassava waterlogging.Socio-economic factors, notably poverty and limited extension services, constrain adoption of climate-smart agricultural practices, intensifying food insecurity evidenced by reduced meal frequency and increased child malnutrition during droughts.The findings highlight critical climatic thresholds for targeted adaptation interventions, emphasizing integrated financial, technical, and infrastructural support to enhance resilience and sustain food production in Tiko's vulnerable smallholder systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.151

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Analysis & Ecology StudiesSame topicClimate change impacts on agricultureFrench-language works237,207