MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7131357203 · doi:10.35914/tomaega.v8i2.3024

Membangun Langkah Promotif-Preventif Terkait Stunting Melalui Pemanfaatan Hasil Pertanian Jewawut (Setaria italica) di Desa Lambanan, Kabupaten Polewali Mandar

2025· article· W7131357203 on OpenAlexaff
Kasmiati Kasmiati, Andi Sri Rahayu Kasma, S W Komang Padma Dewi, Ummu Farah Fadillah

Bibliographic record

VenueTo Maega | Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
Keywordsnot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tingkat kasus stunting yang tinggi di Provinsi Sulawesi Barat perlu diatasi. Maka, upaya penanggulangan bersifat urgen untuk menekan peningkatan prevalensinya. Langkah promotif-preventif yang dapat dilakukan adalah mengedukasi masyarakat dan memanfaatkan hasil pertanian lokal. Bahan pangan lokal dapat dimaksimalkan fungsinya untuk perbaikan gizi anak stunting jika diolah dengan baik. Desa Lambanan, di Kecamatan Balanipa, Kabupaten Polewali Mandar, Provinsi Sulawesi Barat salah satu desa yang memiliki potensi sumber pangan yang beragam seperti tersedianya pangan lokal Jewawut (Setaria italica). Meskipun Jewawut merupakan komoditi pertanian utama masyarakat Lambanan namun belum diolah secara maksimal untuk menanganai persoalan gizi anak-anak. Maka kegiatan pengabdian ini fokus menyebarluaskan pengetahuan tentang potensi jewawut yang dapat digunakan untuk pencegahan stunting. Selain itu kami melakukan pelatihan tentang cara mengolah Jewawut menjadi bubur MPASI yang kaya gizi dan protein. Hasil pengabdian ini menunjukkan ada peningkatan pengetahuan partisipan tentang jewawut dan tunting. Sebelum kegiatan pengetahuan partisipan yang terdiri dari 35 orang berada di angka 75,4 dan setelah penyuluhan dan praktik naik menjadi 84,29.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTo Maega | Jurnal Pengabdian MasyarakatSame topicFood Security and Socioeconomic DynamicsFrench-language works237,207