L’éducation de la petite enfance : fondement de l’avenir de notre société
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article a pour ambition d’explorer, par une approche socio-historique, les fondements à l’origine du courant d’éducation positive en vogue aujourd’hui dans les nouvelles générations de parents et qui ont permis de considérer aujourd’hui l’éducation de la petite enfance comme un pilier essentiel pour le devenir adulte. Après avoir exposé l’éducation positive comme le résultat d’un changement de regard sur l’enfant dans nos sociétés, accompagné d’une modification des normes en éducation depuis les années soixante, la théorie de l’attachement et le courant de l’Éducation Nouvelle seront présentés en soulignant leur large contribution à ces changements de représentations et de pratiques dans l’éducation de la petite enfance. Ces apports permettent de conclure que la petite enfance constitue une condition importante au développement de nos sociétés et soulignent l’importance d’accompagner les premiers éducateurs de l’enfant dans leur mission éducative.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".