Étude didactique des pratiques de classes de deux enseignants dans le secondaire au Bénin en Science de la Terre sur le thème ‘‘naissance et évolution d’un paysage’’
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce travail étudie l’application que font deux enseignants, des prescriptions institutionnelles dans un contexte d’implémentation de l’Approche Par Compétences (APC) sur le thème ‘‘naissance et évolution d’un paysage’’. La question de recherche qui nous guide est : Comment l’enseignement-apprentissage de ce thème est-il mis en œuvre par les enseignants ? En mobilisant la Double Approche Didactique et Ergonomique (DADE) de Robert et Rogalski (2002), Robert (2006 et 2008), nous avons fait un recueil de données suivi d’un traitement. Les résultats montrent que les enseignants observés respectent les prescriptions des programmes d’études scolaires et des guides pédagogiques lorsqu’elles ne nécessitent pas une personnalisation ou une contextualisation de leur part.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".